Judicial Empowerment in Authoritarian Regimes
ثبت نشده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Does De Jure Judicial Independence Really Matter?: A Reevaluation of Explanations for Judicial Independence
The relationship between de jure and de facto judicial independence is much debated in the literature. Some studies find no relationship between the formal rules governing the structure of the judiciary and its de facto independence. Other studies find a significant correlation between de jure and de facto judicial independence, with one study even touting de jure judicial independence as the m...
متن کاملIt’s not what you say, it’s how much you say it: Comparing Authoritarian and Democratic Constitutions Using Latent Text Analysis
While constitutions regulate political authority within a state, there is much we do not know about the interaction between political conditions and constitutional texts. Much of the literature relies upon hand-coded databases of constitutional texts. However, this approach raises both methodological and theoretical concerns. Advances in natural language processing, particularly latent text ana...
متن کاملDoes Judicial Independence Matter? a Study of the Determinants of Administrative Litigation in an Authoritarian Regime
Lawsuits against the government form a part of the regular functioning of legal systems in democratic countries, and responding to such lawsuits constitutes an unavoidable part of governance. However, in the context of authoritarian regimes, administrative litigation has been viewed as a distinctively valuable institution for promoting the rule of law and individual rights. Moreover, the judici...
متن کاملInstitutions of the Offensive : Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes , 1950 – 1992
What are the most important sources of institutional variation among authoritarian regimes, and how do such institutions influence these dictatorships’ propensity to initiate military disputes? This article argues that most existing studies in both comparative politics and international relations employ a flawed conceptualization of authoritarian institutions. Excessive focus on the personaliza...
متن کاملA Cautionary Tale of Post-Communist Judicial Empowerment
This article aims to curb the enthusiasm for post-Communist judicial empowerment by showing that sometimes a powerful judiciary can threaten the rule of law. It argues that the powerful Bulgarian Constitutional Court promotes conflict between the executive and the ordinary judiciary. The “war of institutions” has made Bulgaria the poster child for failed judicial reforms among new European Unio...
متن کامل